Michael Reeves and Witchfinder General

MichaelReeves

 

FADE IN

EXT. SUFFOLK GARDEN, SUMMER’S DAY, 1958

Michael Reeves. Home from school for the long summer holiday.

   NARRATOR (V.O.)

Languid days in the garden and cigarettes behind the shed. Then writing long into the night, scripts meticulously formatted with pencil and ruler: character, action, dialogue, transition. Stories of conflict and movement, travelling through landscapes, real and imagined. Suffolk was his canvas, a landscape which could be imagined as anywhere.

FLASH CUT – – RURAL SUFFOLK (STOCK, INCLUDING KENTWELL HALL AND ORFORD CASTLE)

DISSOLVE TO

EXT. RADLEY COLLEGE. DUSK

Michael slips out by side entrance and heads towards town.

EXT. CINEMA. NIGHT

CUT TO

Poster for Invasion of the Body Snatchers

   NARRATOR (V.O.)

Michael goes to see the film three times in one week trying to work out how Don Siegel achieves those tracking shots with such effortlessness and fluidity.

CUT TO

EXT. GARDEN AGAIN, SUMMER’S DAY

Michael directs and films another boy and a girl

   NARRATOR (V.O.)

He practices the technique, using his mother’s tea trolley as a dolly, camera lashed to the front and him clinging to the back with his knees. Ian does the pushing; handsome, stupid, good-natured Ian: the perfect ingénue.

Fifteen years old and he films his first feature. A girl is being stalked and he casts Ian as the villain. Michael plays the hero; both friends playing against type. His infatuation is not so much about what appears on the screen, that’s just another end-product. The excitement is in the process of creation. To yearn after a project, thinking about it all the time, then to seduce it, moulding it to one’s will, and finally to bring it to a climax using all the skills you’ve culled from watching the work of others.

EXT. 1960S JETLINER LANDING (STOCK)

CUT TO

EXT. LOS ANGELES. DAY(STOCK)

DISSOLVE TO

EXT. FRONT DOOR OF HOLLYWOOD HOUSE

Michael rings the doorbell

TRACKING SHOT ALL ROUND MICHAEL AND BACK TO DOOR

   NARRATOR (V.O.)

It was a crazy idea, going to the States aged just seventeen, with a battered brown holdall and a steely ambition. Even crazier to ring Don Siegel’s front doorbell.

   MICHAEL

You don’t know me Mr Siegel but I’ve come all the way from England because I’m your biggest fan. I’m talented and I want a job making films. You won’t regret saying yes, I promise you.

   NARRATOR (V.O.)

But something about the kid convinces Don into saying yes, scares him into saying yes, and Michael, all confidence and swagger, is pitched into the role of production assistant. He works first on The Long Ships and then on Castle of the Living Dead.

FOOTAGE FROM BOTH FILMS BEHIND VOICE OVER

   NARRATOR (V.O.)

Behind the youthful bravado Michael begins to show real talent. He impresses producer Paul Maslansky so much that he is given the director’s chair for a B-movie being shot in Italy, Revenge of the Blood Beast. Naturally, he finds a role in the film for Ian. Ian features again in Michael’s next project, a film called The Sorcerers produced back in England.

FOOTAGE FROM REVENGE OF THE BLOOD BEAST BEHIND VOICE OVER

   NARRATOR (V.O.)

But Michael’s big coup is the chance to direct a major Hollywood star, albeit one in the twilight of his career. Boris Karloff plays a scientist who devises a way to control the mind and actions of others and thereby is enabled vicariously to enjoy the illicit thrills of swinging London. The parallels with 1960s cinema – voyeuristically enjoying the delights of the permissive society – are obvious. Naturally, Ian is Karloff’s unfortunate puppet in the film.

FOOTAGE FROM THE SORCERORS – – BORIS KARLOFF AND IAN OGILVY

   NARRATOR (V.O.)

But it was another horror film which established Michael Reeves’s reputation as a truly creative director. Witchfinder General is set at the time of the English Civil War but, in its narrative format, more closely resembles a western; a tale of violent crime, pursuit and equally violent revenge.

Vincent Price plays Matthew Hopkins, a ‘witch-finder’ given licence by Cromwell’s authorities to roam East Anglia with his henchman, John Stearne, searching for witches. Their reign of terror involves torture, sexual assault and murder, all for Hopkins’s gratification and financial gain.

FOOTAGE OF VINCENT PRICE AS MATTHEW HOPKINS

SOURCE CREDIT - "British Film Institute"</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> <p>Reproduction of this image requires the appropriate copyright clearance. In making this image available, the bfi confers no licence to use or copy the image. All copyright clearance is the responsibility of the user.</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> <p>In consideration for making this image available, the user hereby agrees to indemnify the bfi against any claim or liability arising from the use of this image.</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> <p>The information service of the bfi National Library may be able to carry out copyright ownership research on your behalf. Fax +44 (0) 20 7436 0165 for details of services and costs.</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> <p>British Film Institute<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> 21 Stephen Street<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> London W1T 1LN<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> Tel +44 (0) 20 7255 1444<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> http://www.bfi.org.uk/

   NARRATOR (V.O.)

When Hopkins and Stearne turn their attentions on a young woman and her uncle, a village priest, they invoke the wrath of her fiancé, an officer in Cromwell’s army. The officer is played by Ian Ogilvy, naturally, and his pursuit of the Witchfinder General is relentless and his revenge bloody.

WitchfinderPoster

Michael Reeves coaxes an outstanding performance from Price, though their relationship was not without friction.

   PRICE (V.O.)

I have made eighty-four movies, young man. How many have you made?

   REEVES (V.O.)

Two very good ones.

   NARRATOR (V.O.)

But the star of Witchfinder General is the landscape of Suffolk. Its woods, its rolling meadows, its country lanes, its villages. But, above all else, the skyscapes of Suffolk, which Reeves presents as almost Turneresque in their glowering beauty. These skies are captured with painterly craftsmanship by John Coquillon using his trusty Arriflex camera.

FOOTAGE FROM WITCHFINDER GENERAL BEHIND VOICE OVER, SUFFOLK LANDSCAPE AND SKIES

   NARRATOR (V.O.)

Witchfinder General, for all its gore and amorality, is Michael Reeves’s love letter to the county of his childhood; to the landscape of his memory and imagination.

DISSOLVE TO STOCK FOOTAGE OF SWINGING SIXTIES LONDON

   NARRATOR (V.O.)

Following the success of Witchfinder General, Reeves’s career seemed as if it was about to go into overdrive. He was bombarded with scripts and offers from Hollywood. But he subsided into an unexpected depressive inertia, finding comfort only in booze and pills.

The delights of Swinging London and hip California flung themselves at his feet but, somehow, none of it seemed to be enough to lift his mood. One evening in February 1969 Reeves came home alone to his flat in Cadogan Place, Knightsbridge. Drunk, but unable to sleep, he took a handful of anti-depressants and went back to bed. He never woke up.

BLACK AND WHITE FOOTAGE OF GARDENS AT GOLDERS GREEN CREMATORIUM

Whether Michael Reeves’s death was a deliberate act of his own making or a tragic accident we will never know. But his passing at the age of just twenty-five deprived British cinema of one its greatest talents; a barely fulfilled talent.

DISSOLVE TO BLACK SCREEN

SOUND of ‘Fade into You’ by Mazzy Star

ROLL DEDICATION AND CREDITS

This film is dedicated to the memory of the women and men of Suffolk who were tortured and killed at the hands of the real Matthew Hopkins, Witchfinder General, in the Bury St Edmunds atrocity of 27th August 1645:

Anne Alderman – hanged 27th August 1645

Mary Bacon – hanged 27th August 1645

Mary Clowes – hanged 27th August 1645

Thomas Everard – hanged 27th August 1645

Mary Everard – hanged 27th August 1645

Mary Fuller – hanged 27th August 1645

Anne Leech – hanged August 1645

Jane Linstead – hanged 27th August 1645

John Lowes, Vicar of Brandeston – hanged 27th August 1645

Susan Manners – hanged 27th August 1645

Rebecca Morris – hanged 27th August 1645

Jane Rivet – hanged 27th August 1645

Mary Skipper – hanged 27th August 1645

Mary Smith – hanged 27th August 1645

Margery Sparham – hanged 27th August 1645

Sarah Spindler – hanged 27th August 1645

Katherine Tooly – hanged 27th August 1645

Anne Wright – hanged 27th August 1645

BLACK SCREEN. SILENCE.

 

For further information on the locations used in the filming of Witchfinder General, follow this link

 

Posted in Home | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Drift on Wat’s Dyke

Swathed bodies in the long ditch; one eye upstaring. It is safe to presume, here, the king’s anger. He reigned forty years. Seasons touched and retouched the soil.  Heathland, new-made watermeadow. Charlock, marsh-marigold. Crepitant oak forest where the boar furrowed black mould, his snout intimate with worms and leaves.

Geoffrey Hill, Mercian Hymns, XI.

Wat's Dyke 1

There are a couple of initial problems with writing about Wat’s Dyke.  First of all, we don’t know exactly when it was built, though the best current guess is that it was completed during the ninth century, at some point before the better-known Offa’s Dyke.  Secondly, we have no idea of the identity of the eponymous Wat.  We can be pretty certain that the dyke was built by the Saxon kingdom of Mercia as a defensive barrier against the Welsh to the west.  There is no record of a local ruler or military commander by the name of Wat so the name of the dyke may well be derived from the Anglo-Saxon word wæt, which means wet and is perhaps appropriate for this decidedly dank part of the world.  But maybe this mystery about when and by whom it was built is part of the charm of Wat’s Dyke.

Wat's Dyke 2

The dyke is about forty miles in length and runs from north Shropshire up through the present-day counties of Wrexham and Flintshire, ending near the ancient town of Holywell.  This is border country, shaped and moulded by human hand over many centuries.  It is not a wilderness; much of Wat’s Dyke runs through established farmland and skirts round a number of villages.  Its course also takes it through the urban heart of Wrexham.  And yet, in the sections where the ditch and dyke earthwork is still evident, such as in the two pictures above, something curious happens.  Wat’s Dyke seems to have a character of its own; walking along the top of the dyke, one seems to feel separate from the surrounding farmland.  Separate in both a physical and a temporal sense; one has a feeling of being cocooned within a timeless corridor or walkway; one where the dyke’s Saxon makers are still very close at hand.

Wat's Dyke 3

Wat's Dyke

We set off from Ruabon, just across the Welsh border from Oswestry, and head north along way-marked paths.  This is one of the best preserved sections of the dyke.  A 2.5 metre ditch was originally flanked by a 2 metre dyke on its eastern side, giving good visibility across the flat river valley towards the Welsh hills. But along the top of the dyke the hedgerow is dark and dense.  Below, the black, still water of the ditch sits and broods.  The whole place has a cold, mournful feel and we trudge on silently.

As we pass through a rusty kissing gate, a wild-haired figure on a quad-bike rears up from behind a hedge like some marauding charioteer.  He stops, smiles and bids us good day.  He farms this land, he tells us.  The farmhouse which we’d passed earlier belongs to him and is ‘fairly new’, having been built just three hundred years ago.  But his family have been on this land since the fourteenth century.

The dyke continues north through farmland and then passes through the parkland of the Erddig estate, which is now controlled by the National Trust.  From here we walk through the centre of Wrexham, noting, courtesy of Pete Lewis’s excellent book, that the parish church is dedicated to St Giles, the patron saint of lepers.  The town once had more than twenty breweries; I recall visiting Wrexham in the 1980s and enjoying the heady aroma of hops and malt which clung to the very fabric the town.

Wat's Dyke 4

To the north of Wrexham the nature of the countryside changes and the mark of old industries, which have come and then gone, is more evident.  We pass an abandoned quarry and spoil heap near Gresford.  The village of Gresford will forever be associated with the mining disaster of 1934 when 266 men died.  They were all docked a quarter day’s pay for not completing the shift.

Towards Llay a number of derelict mine-workings can be seen from our route.  Grown-over and relentlessly merging back into the landscape.  At one level they present an ineffably sad picture, but these works of humankind seem at least to be making their peace with nature 

Wat's Dyke 5

Wat's Dyke 6

Wat's Dyke 7

Wat's Dyke 7

Towards the end of our walk, where the path skirts a road, we stop to inspect a fly-tip sculpture adorning the embankment.  No trace of the dyke itself is evident for the last two or three miles of our walk.  We end our journey at Caergwrle, home to a ruined thirteenth-century castle built by Dafydd ap Gruffydd and formerly a spa town.  Travelling home by train, we talk about our day.  What have we learned?  Nothing very much about Wat and the builders of his dyke.  But the whole point was the journey, the walk, not the destination.  But we did return home with a real sense of an ancient border landscape and a path walked by many before us.

Paths that cross
cross again
Paths that cross
will cross again

Patti Smith, Paths That Cross

 

Map courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

Posted in Home | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Pandaemonium: The Coming of the Machine as Seen by Contemporary Observers – Humphrey Jennings – Book of the Month, November 2012

 

I first read Pandaemonium shortly after it was published in 1985 and have enjoyed dipping into it from time to time ever since. I have the Andre Deutsch version, the one with the cover featuring P.J. de Loutherbourg’s ‘Coalbrookdale at Night’; a picture which gives me a frisson of sulphur-charged excitement whenever I look at it.

Pandaemonium Cover 1985

Humphrey Jennings was a British documentary film-maker whose career was cut tragically short in 1950 when, at the age of just forty-three, he fell from a cliff in Greece when scouting film locations. Jennings was a socialist, a champion of surrealism and one of the founders of Mass Observation. He was also a pioneer of neo-realism, coaxing extraordinary performances from non-professional actors in several of his works. His best known films are Fires Were Started, The Silent Village and A Diary for Timothy.  Lindsay Anderson described Jennings as ‘the only real poet that British cinema has produced’.

Humphrey Jennings

Jennings first started the Pandaemonium project in 1938, initially as a series of talks for miners in South Wales when filming The Silent Village. But the anthology was not completed until nearly forty years after his death, in a collaboration between his daughter, Mary-Lou Jennings, and his former Mass Observation colleague, Charles Madge.

Pandaemonium is a history of Britain’s Industrial Revolution told through the words of those who witnessed it; ordinary men and women, industrialists, politicians and artists. Jennings’s collection is eclectic: books, articles, diaries and letters spanning a period of more than two hundred years. Many of the extracts featured are written by names with whom we are still familiar: Shelley, Carlyle and Charles Kingsley, for instance. Others who are quoted, the people of no property, would otherwise be long forgotten.

Jennings’s vision was a filmic one. Indeed, he refers to the extracts he compiled as ‘images’. But this is not just reportage, Jennings aimed to create a work that was of the imagination; a word film which captures the full range of human responses to a period of cataclysmic change in British society.

The book’s title is taken from Book 1 of Milton’s Paradise Lost, The Building of Pandaemonium. The noise, the smell and the heat of coal, iron and engines pervade this book. A nation, a society and a people turned upside down. The coming of The Machine.

There stood a Hill not far whose griesly top
Belch’d fire and rowling smoak; the rest entire
Shon with a glossie scurff, undoubted sign
That in his womb was hid metallic Ore,
The work of Sulphur. Thither wing’d with speed
A numerous Brigad hasten’d. As when Bands
Of Pioners with Spade and Pickax arm’d
Forerun the Royal Camp, to trench a Field,
Or cast a Rampart. Mammon led them on,
Mammon, the least erected Spirit that fell
From heav’n, for ev’n in heav’n his looks and thoughts
Were always downward bent, admiring more
The riches of Heav’ns pavement, trod’n Gold,
Then aught divine or holy else enjoy’d
In vision
beatific: by him first
Men also, and by his suggestion taught,
Ransack’d the
Center, and with impious hands
Rifl’d the bowels of thir mother Earth
For Treasures better hid. Soon had his crew
Op’nd into the Hill a spacious wound
And dig’d out ribs of Gold. Let none admire
That riches grow in Hell; that soyle may best
Deserve the precious bane. And here let those
Who boast in mortal things, and wond’ring tell
Of Babel, and the works of Memphian Kings
Learn how thir greatest Monuments of Fame,
And Strength and Art are easily out-done
By Spirits reprobate, and in an hour
What in an age they with incessant toyle
And hands innumerable scarce perform.
John Milton, Paradise Lost, Book 1, 1667

 

Many of those whose words are featured in Pandaemonium lament for something they see being lost in the furnace of industrialisation:

A frightful scene ….. a dense cloud of pestilential smoke hangs over it forever ……. and at night the whole region burns like a volcano spitting fire from a thousand tubes of brick. But oh the wretched thousands of mortals who grind out their destiny there!

Thomas Carlyle, 1824

Others bemoan the foul streets and smoking factories which spring up where once there were trees and fields:

Pimlico and Knightsbridge are now almost joined to Chelsea and Kensington; and if this infatuation continues for half a century, I suppose the whole county of Middlesex will be covered with brick.

                                            The Expedition of Humphrey Clinker, Tobias Smollett, 1771.

At least as many, however, discern hope for the future amongst all the trials of the present:

There is a time coming when realities shall go beyond any dreams that have been told of these things. Nation exchanging with nation their products freely… universal enfranchisement, railways, electric telegraphs, public schools… the greatest of the moral levers for elevating mankind.

                                    The Autobiography of a Working Man, Alexander Somerville, 1848

This duality, the need to pass through fire to forge a new Jerusalem, is perhaps what Frank Cottrell Boyce had in mind when he scripted the Olympic opening ceremony. In Milton’s vision of Pandaemonium the power of iron and fire is wrested from the Devil to be used by mankind. Boyce and Jennings are seemingly joined in a Promethean bond. Indeed, Boyce gives specific credit to the influence of Jennings’s book on the ideas and imagery he brought to the 2012 project.

Olympic Ceremony

Jennings’s approach to the texts that he selects betrays his leaning towards Marxism and Romanticism. But, above all else, this is the vision of film-maker, a man who loved to frame images and paint pictures, in this case with words. So how does one set about reading such a labyrinthine set of texts? Humphrey Jennings foresaw this issue and advised:

There are at least three different ways in which you may tackle this book. First, you may read it straight through from the beginning as a continuous narrative or film on the Industrial Revolution. Second, you may open it where you will, choose one or a group of passages and study in them details of events, persons and thoughts as one studies the material and architecture of a poem. Third way, you begin with the index – look up a subject or idea, and follow references, skipping over gaps of years to pursue its development.

Jennings never lived to construct this index, but we have Charles Madge to thank for doing so posthumously from his friend’s notes. Madge’s ‘theme sequence’ provides the key to help unlock the treasures within Jennings’s work.

 

London 2012 image courtesy of the Daily Telegraph

Posted in Home | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

November 2012

This past month Psychogeographic Review has been reading:

To the Lighthouse   ‘To the Lighthouse’ – Virginia Woolf

Kid - Simon Armitage   ‘Kid’ – Simon Armitage

Four Quartets   ‘Four Quartets’ – T.S. Eliot

The Yellow Wallpaper   ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’ – Charlotte Perkins Gilman

Dracula - Bram Stoker   ‘Dracula’ – Bram Stoker

A Journey Through Ruins   ‘A Journey Through Ruins: The Last Days of London’ – Patrick Wright

All Quiet on the Orient Express   ‘All Quiet on the Orient Express’ – Magnus Mills

Good Work   ‘Good Work’ – E.F. Schumacher

 

Meanwhile, we were listening to:

Music for the Quiet Hour   ‘Music for the Quiet Hour’ – Shackleton

Actor St Vincent   ‘Actor’ – St Vincent

Bow Down to the Exit Sign   ‘Bow Down to the Exit Sign’ – David Holmes

Totales Turns   ‘Totale’s Turns (It’s Now or Never) – The Fall

Magicians Hat   ‘Magician’s Hat’ – Bo Hansson

The Machine That Cried   ‘The Machine That Cried’ – String Driven Thing

Posted in Home | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

From Streetwalker to Street Walker: The Rise of the Flâneuse

In fact and in fantasy, London had become a contested terrain: new commercial spaces and journalist practices, expanding networks of female philanthropy, and a range of public spectacles . . . enabled workingmen and women of many classes to challenge the traditional privileges of elite male spectators and to assert their presence in the public domain. In so doing they revised and reworked the dominant literary mappings of London to accommodate their own social practices and fantasies. The effect was a set of urban encounters far less polarised and far more interactive than those imagined by the great literary chroniclers of the metropolis.

(Judith R Walkowitz, City of Dreadful Delight: Narratives of Sexual Danger in Late-Victorian London)

Reading Mrs Dalloway again recently and writing the two Woolf-related pieces featured elsewhere on this blog set me thinking. At what point did the concept of the flâneuse emerge? And does the idea bear any relation to the reality that most women experience, or is it still just a literary device? In other words, to what degree, if any, do women today enjoy greater freedom to inhabit our urban spaces than that which was experienced by women a hundred years ago?

If we look at the early twentieth-century, we can see that women, in particular middle class women, incrementally gained a range of new freedoms; the freedom to walk alone in certain districts, at least during the hours of daylight, the freedom to work, within certain prescribed limits, and the freedom to shop – to wander through the commercial districts of major cities in order to look, to compare and to buy. Working-class women had always been free to wander the streets of the city, provided their perambulations were strictly related to their work or family responsibilities. Women who were out after dark, walking down the wrong street, or even walking at too leisurely a pace risked being subject to assumptions about their sexual availability. From Victorian times onwards, women’s participation in the life of the city gradually moved from the domestic to the public setting.

This increase in freedom of mobility for women, especially that of middle-class women, was in essence a metropolitan phenomenon – the new woman, the working girl, the female shopper; all became growing types of female presence in the modern city. Though clearly bounded by the demands of employers and commerce, this nonetheless represents a growth in freedom for women. Previously the streets had been the realm only of men, or of women escorted by men, and of women who had to resort to prostitution in order to survive. But the early twentieth-century saw an improvement to policing and street lighting in central London, the extension of the underground system and a greater prevalence of bicycles. This led to increased freedom of movement for middle class women. But even for middle class women, there were limits to how far they could push against the boundaries of entrenched attitudes.

This change, this increase in women’s freedom to wander through the city, is reflected in the fiction of the time: Katherine Mansfield, Dorothy Richardson and Virginia Woolf all portray female characters who have ready access to the streets of the metropolis in a way unknown to previous generations of women. Female characters from starkly different backgrounds – Ada Moss, the struggling actress forced into occasional prostitution in Mansfield’s Pictures, Miriam Henderson, the respectable working girl and autodidact in Richardson’s Pilgrimage and the wealthy politician’s wife, Clarissa Dalloway, in Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway – are all depicted as being able to enjoy the freedom to walk through London alone.The question then is did these, albeit limited, freedoms that were allowed to women, and the writers who reflected their lives in their fiction, create the female equivalent of the male flâneur; in other words, did early modernism bring with it the creation of a recognisable flâneuse?

 

 

Shopping and the Commodification of Flânerie

Benjamin’s archetypal flâneur wandered the Parisian shopping arcades. London had its own arcades, modelled on those of Paris, but these did not become the haunt of the flâneuse. Although, in the early twentieth-century, women were increasingly able to shop without being accompanied by men, it was the new department stores rather than the arcades which they made their own. Department stores, women discovered, invite flânerie. The department store, like the arcade before it, constructed fantasy worlds for itinerant lookers. But unlike the arcade, it offered a protected site for the empowered gaze of the flâneuse. The existence of the flâneuse was only possible when a woman could wander the city on her own, a freedom linked to the privilege of shopping on her own.

Eatons Department Store

Department stores became central fixtures in most large cities by the early years of the century; and from the start they employed female sales assistants, allowing women to be both buyers and sellers and not just another commodity for the enjoyment of the male gaze. But with this freedom came another form of commodification, this time at the hands of the advertisers and marketing agents. Judith Walkowitz suggests that many male commentators of the time wrapped up misogyny in a cloak of moral objection to market culture by casting it as ‘sordid and feminized’.

Women enjoyed new freedoms from these changes to the city centre, but the driving force was the market and not ideology; retailers quickly learned to target window displays and advertising at the female eye. There was new mobility for some women, but it fell far short of that enjoyed by the male flâneur; the freedom of the department store flâneuse is, after all, regulated by the male department store manager.

 

 

Prostitution and the Tyranny of Public Space

Thus in the public arena, the streets of the city, women are prey to the harassment of male optical gratification. Women cannot simply walk, they do not stroll, they certainly do not loiter. They are in public with a function, such as is provided by markets and shops and meeting children.

(Chris Jenks (ed), Visual Culture)

In some ways, despite the limitations imposed by the prevailing culture, women have nonetheless always been able to take part in urban observation. But working-class women, who effectively had the greater freedom to roam, in daylight at least, were the least likely group to have their observations recorded. Therefore, it was with the development of modernist writing, particularly in the works of Woolf and Richardson, that women were able to chronicle these observations. Almost all of Benjamin’s city figures were male – the flâneur, the gambler, the rag-picker. The one exception is the prostitute, or streetwalker. As Judith Walkowitz puts it:

The prostitute was the quintessential female figure of the urban scene . . . for men as well as women, the prostitute was a central spectacle in a set of urban encounters and fantasies.

(Judith R Walkowitz, City of Dreadful Delight: Narratives of Sexual Danger in Late-Victorian London)

Prostitution was indeed the female version of flânerie, which serves only to emphasise the inequality of gender differences in this era. The male flâneur was simply a man who loitered on the streets; but women who loitered risked being seen as prostitutes, streetwalkers, or les grandes horizontalesas they were known in nineteenth-century Paris.

Streetwalker - Eugene Atget

The image of the prostitute, the most significant female image in The Arcades Project, is the embodiment of the prevailing male attitude to women at this time. Benjamin links together prostitution and gambling as the two sides of alienated sexual desire:

for in the bordello and gaming hall it is the same, most sinful delight: to insert fate within desire, and this, not desire itself, is to be condemned.

In a time when the city streets were the domain of men, any woman walking alone in a public place was viewed as a fallen woman. Whatever her position or motivation, she invariably functioned as a projection of the male loiterer’s alienation or as a symbol of a form of social ‘contamination’ that had to be purged. In either case she is objectified.

Prostitution reflects the economic relationship of women and men. But, argues Benjamin, wrapped up in that relationship are also elements of fantasy, desire, pleasure, anxiety, guilt, shame, regulation and exploitation. Of particular interest to Benjamin is the ‘gaze’ of the customer upon the prostitute; a subjectively masculine gaze which tells us it is acceptable for men to gaze at women, but not the reverse. But, counters Walkowitz, male sensibilities were threatened by the fact that the prostitute did gaze back: in a look that was ‘audacious, unflinching’.

Indeed, there may well be a link between flânerie and voyeurism: when the flâneur absorbs the city visually he does so on the basis of a sense of entitlement; he acts as if he owns the city; which, in terms of the power held by his gender at least, he does. The flâneuse, in literature and on our streets, joyfully subverts this norm.

 

Images

Eaton’s Department Store 1920s (out of copyright)

Streetwalker by Eugene Atget 1920s (out of copyright)

Posted in Home | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Woolf at the Door 2: Mrs Dalloway’s Inner Flâneur

 

In Virginia Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway Peter Walsh is the most obvious flâneur character; he is able to wander the streets of London with an abandon even the patrician Clarissa Dalloway cannot manage. In an encounter which in its imagery reminds one of Baudelaire’s idea of the passante, Peter Walsh notices an attractive young woman as he walks through Trafalgar Square:

But she’s extraordinarily attractive, he thought, as, walking across Trafalgar Square in the direction of the Haymarket, came a young woman who, as she passed Gordon’s statue, seemed, Peter Walsh thought (susceptible as he was), to shed veil after veil, until she became the very woman he had always had in mind; young, but stately; merry, but discreet; black, but enchanting.

But Woolf subverts the conventional norms and, in this encounter, transforms Baudelaire’s objectified passante into an assertive flâneuse. Although Peter Walsh is presented as being able to wander the streets of London with freedom and detachment, Woolf’s depiction of his attempts to pick up the young woman he encounters in Trafalgar Square in a way that subverts his confident desires with an eventual realisation that he will never possess her. He follows her, imagining himself as ‘a romantic buccaneer, careless of all these damned proprieties’. But, as she reaches her house and puts her key to the door, she quickly turns and snubs him with ‘one look in his direction, but not at him’. Elsewhere, we read of Clarissa’s daughter, Elizabeth, being described as a ‘pirate’ when she boards a bus on the Strand. This echoes Peter’s ‘buccaneer’ self-description, but is applied to Elizabeth without any irony.

Mrs Dalloway

Mrs Dalloway opens with Clarissa standing poised at the roadside in Victoria Street waiting to cross over towards Bond Street and finish the errands she needs to complete before her party. Both Victoria and Bond Streets are busy, modern city streets. But at the same time they simultaneously evoke and serve as symbols of wealth, power and tradition; qualities that embody the Empire they represent. Clarissa is able to wander freely; her freedom of movement intimately tied to her class position, rather than her gender. The sense of underlying power and privilege is symbolized by a passing car in which:

there could be no doubt greatness was seated within; greatness was passing, hidden, down Bond Street, removed only by a hand’s-breadth from ordinary people who might now, for the first and last time, be within speaking distance of the majesty of England, of the enduring symbol of the state…

 

Clarissa’s immediate motivation for walking through the streets of central London in the opening pages of Mrs Dalloway is undoubtedly more to do with her need to prepare for that evening’s party than any wish to map out a spiritual or psychological journey. In that sense, it would be difficult to apply the epithet flâneuse to her. However, the very act of walking provides her with the opportunity and impetus to reminisce and to analyse the key relationships in her life. She thinks about her father, her husband and her daughter and, as she walks, her thoughts drift on into an existential reverie that belies her calm exterior:

Did it matter then, she asked herself, walking towards Bond Street, did it matter that she must inevitably cease completely; all this must go on without her; did she resent it; or did it not become consoling to believe that death ended absolutely? But that somehow in the streets of London, on the ebb and flow of things, here, there, she survived.

It is a fine June morning and Clarissa’s consciousness immediately conjures up reminiscences of such mornings at Bourton when she was young and of when, at eighteen, she chose to marry Richard and not Peter. Peter had called her ‘cold, heartless, a prude.’ She stills feels the indignation of that moment when she reminds herself:

She would not say of anyone in the world now that they were this or they were that. She felt very young; at the same time unspeakably aged. She sliced like a knife through everything; at the same time was outside, looking on . . . she would not say of Peter, she would not say of herself, I am this, or I am that.

Woolf surveys the human topography of London in Mrs Dalloway; she depicts landscapes that reinforce boundaries of class and gender; rich and poor, men and women, each of them lives in a different London. She also creates dichotomies of public and private, internal and external and past and present. The London through which Woolf’s characters move is dominated by the symbols of authority: Westminster Abbey, Buckingham Palace, St Paul’s Cathedral; and the life of each character is punctuated by the omnipresent sound of Big Ben. But Woolf also hints at a creeping Americanisation of British life; perhaps giving away something of her own position in a somewhat negative suggestion of tradition being usurped by vulgar commerce. She highlights shopkeepers ‘fidgeting in their windows with their paste and diamonds’, arranging their displays of jewellery ‘to tempt Americans’, and the aeroplane writing advertising slogans in the sky as symbols of rampant commercialism.

The Strand

Clarissa Dalloway is ostensibly part of the established order Bond Street represents. As she perambulates through the streets of London, her thoughts wander between memories of her landed gentry upbringing and plans for her elaborate party that evening. She wanders the streets glowing with excitement:

In people’s eyes, in the swing, tramp, and trudge; in the bellow and the uproar; the carriages, motor cars, omnibuses, vans, sandwich men shuffling and swinging; brass bands; barrel organs; in the triumph and the jingle and the strange high singing of some aeroplane overhead was what she loved; life; London; this moment of June.

And it is London that she loves: ‘I love walking in London’ and ‘really its better than walking in the country.’ Rachel Bowlby sees significance in the very surname that Woolf gives to her protagonist; Clarissa Dalloway is a woman who likes to dally along the way; in other words, she is a flâneuse. Power, wealth and history are all evoked in these opening pages. But this is a London still recovering from war, from the devastation and grief, and cracks in the edifice of kingdom and empire quickly percolate to the surface of Clarissa’s thoughts:

The war was over, except for Mrs. Foxcroft at the Embassy last night eating her heart out because that nice boy was killed and now the old Manor House must go to a cousin; or Lady Bexborough who opened a bazaar, they said, with the telegram in her hand, John, her favourite, killed.

Mrs Dalloway owes much to James Joyce’s Ulysses, which Woolf was reading at the time she wrote her book. In the way she describes her characters, what they are doing while they think and the way she creates their inner life, one can see the influence of Joyce:

In her story, as in the opening episodes of Ulysses, a character leaves home in the morning and while she walks, thoughts prompted by the immediate scene are mixed with memories and reflections. In both works close attention is paid to place and time: the routes of the characters can be followed on a map and both Bloom and Clarissa hear the chimes of a clock.

(Susan Dick, Virginia Woolf)

Memory, in both, is mixed with anticipation: Clarissa must prepare for her party and Bloom plans to attend a funeral. Woolf also shares with Joyce the employment of fragmentary thoughts and memories and, like him, she is able to move from the consciousness of one character to that of another. Woolf’s aim is for the audible narrator, whom the reader ‘knows’ to be there, to disappear and for the story to be told by the consciousness of the characters. The two centres of consciousness in Mrs Dalloway, Clarissa and Septimus, each weighed down by memory, criss-cross London on that June day, but never meet. The exploration of consciousness is without doubt a unifying factor of Mrs Dalloway and Pilgrimage.

In one of her short stories, Street Haunting, Woolf suggests that the city streets provide the female flâneur with a cloak of anonymity; the opportunity to merge into the crowd:

Am I here, or am I there? Or is the true self neither this nor that, neither here nor there, but something so varied and wandering…

Indeed it is in this short story that Woolf most closely observes the pleasures of the flâneuse; as she walks, the narrator constantly creates stories about what she sees around her; the act of walking transmutes into the act of writing. A quest to buy a pencil takes the narrator through the streets of London; and in those streets, alone and silent, she absorbs and possesses all the tantalising sights that catch her eye:

Passing, glimpsing, everything seems accidentally but miraculously sprinkled with beauty, as if the tide of trade which deposits its burden so punctually and prosaically upon the shores of Oxford Street had this night cast up nothing but treasure. With no thought of buying, the eye is sportive and generous; it creates; it adorns; it enhances. Standing out in the street, one may build up all the chambers of an imaginary house and furnish them at one’s will …

Woolf’s protagonist in Street Hauntingremarks on the beauty of London’s streets ‘with its islands of light, and its long groves of darkness’. The streets are washed with yellow lamplight from numerous offices and the narrator speculates on the work of lowly clerks in dingy chambers poring over documents with ‘wetted forefinger’. Her pencil bought, she returns home, leaving behind the tide of trade washed up on ‘the shores of Oxford Street’.

Similar themes are explored in another essay in the same collection, The Cinema. In both essays Woolf is particularly interested in the relationship between the eye, which glides effortlessly over the surface and ‘licks it all up instantly’ and the brain, which ‘resting, pausing, perhaps sleeps as the eye looks.’ Yet, when the eye ‘wants help’ and calls, ‘you are needed,’ the brain is ready: and the eye and the brain are those of the flâneuse. A Room of One’s Own suggests elements of flânerie too. Though its title indicates that its focus is set indoors, its form takes that of a ramble from Oxbridge, to London and the British Museum before the narrator sits down to write about her journey. The narrator speaks of ‘the fascination of the London street’ and urges her readers to ‘loiter at street corners’ in order to find the inspiration ‘to write all kinds of books.’

 

Image of The Strand courtesy of the George Reid Collection

Posted in Home | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Woolf at the Door 1: The City and Modernism

(Cities were) more than accidental meeting places and crossing points. They were generative environments of the new arts, focal points of intellectual community, indeed of intellectual conflict and tension.

(Malcolm Bradbury and James McFarlane (ed), Modernism: A Guide to European Literature 1890 – 1930)

Modernism is very much a phenomenon of the city. Writers from previous generations, Dickens, Gissing and Wells, had all written about London. However, as realist writers, they created narratives driven by plot and character. London was, thus, the backdrop against which these writers’ characters acted out their lives, rather than the city itself being an integral partof the story. Dickens and Gissing’s characters were clearly affected by their experience of urban life. However, early modernist writers, such as Woolf, Eliot, Joyce and Richardson, took this further by exploring, through their writing, the psychological impact that metropolitan life had upon their protagonists; the effect of what Walter Benjamin referred to as the ‘shock’ of life in a modern city.

Modernist writers saw the city as a space to be conceptualised and understood; cities in all their complexity, where spaces overlap and coalesce and are defined variously by economic function, social class, history and topographical character.

Thus, modernist writing had a strong tendency to encapsulate the experience of life within the city, and to make the city-novel or the city-poem one of its main forms. In England, modernism took the form of a reaction by predominantly metropolitan writers against the strictures of Victorianism. London was important to the development of modernism for several key reasons; it was the world’s biggest city in the early part of twentieth-century, having expanded with extraordinary rapidity, and it was the locus of a burgeoning growth of technology and increased mobility. In the nineteenth-century, with writers like Dickens and Baudelaire, artists saw that the city informed the consciousness of its inhabitants. This tradition continued in the twentieth-century with, for example, Joyce’s Ulysses and Döblin’s Berlin Alexanderplatz.

But this was a tradition both embraced and transformed by women modernist writers, most notably Richardson and Woolf. Exploring female personality and the very nature of consciousness itself, they adopted Walter Benjamin’s maxim that ‘life in all its variety and inexhaustible wealth of variations thrives among the grey cobblestones.’ (Walter Benjamin, Charles Baudelaire: A Lyric Poet in the Era of High Capitalism)

Virginia Woolf

In the time in which Woolf was writing, London established itself as the point of concentration for English national culture and established dominance over communication, journalism and the arts. From the 1890s onwards, the average age of marriage increased, women began to enter the universities and the workplace and became more evident on the streets of the commercial centres of major cities. The numbers of such women were not great, but their impact was major and the New Woman was a prominent social and cultural figure of this era. Initially, this new breed of educated, single working woman was represented only in the works of male writers such as HG Wells, with Anna Veronica in 1909 being his most notable example. Whilst there was some support for the New Woman from male writers, many of them had an almost voyeuristic fascination with her sexuality and agonised about her supposed loss of femininity and her reduced prospects of marriage.

However, the early years of the twentieth century saw an explosion in women’s autobiography and fiction that represented an increased sense of empowerment and self-actualisation by women. Alongside this came increased physical mobility for women; not just in terms of opportunities to travel independently outside the family home, but by other changes such as simply being able to wear less constricting clothing. The New Woman became adept at using train timetables and bicycles and a number of, mainly educated Edwardian women, took part in street marches in support of women’s suffrage. By the time of the Great War, women writers, such as Mansfield, Richardson and Woolf, began to write about the types of metropolitan women with whom they were familiar; to write about women from a woman’s perspective:

This simultaneous experience of difference from and yet identification with the walking male writer becomes the central feature of the self-reflexive modernism of Dorothy Richardson, who can be interpreted as progressing from merely borrowing or identifying with the masculinized tropes of attic room and street, to constructing them as the spaces of the woman in the city, the flâneuse.

(Deborah Parsons, Streetwalking the Metropolis: Women, the City and Modernity)

Modernist writers stretched the boundaries of subject matter and form at a pace which reflected that of the fast-moving modern city; they embraced the task of depicting the rapid growth of metropolitan life and the impact that it had on their characters in the fiction that they produced.

Taking up this challenge, Virginia Woolf insisted that her main concern was with the way a story is told, and with the function of the story itself, rather than simply telling a tale. For Woolf, the need to tell a story should not get in the way of the writing. For this reason she abandoned the conventional linear story-telling conventions. Dorothy Richardson came to similar conclusions and explored her resulting ideas in her work Pilgrimage.

As well as a focus on the actual words, Virginia Woolf evolved a new approach to the use of rhythm in her writing too; the pace of life in a modern city was disorientating and intense; gone were the slower rhythms of the countryside, to be replaced by a panoply of sensual inputs. Woolf, and others, suggested that city life affected the rhythms of consciousness itself. This view is reflected in Woolf’s writing and informs her dissatisfaction with conventional realist narrative forms.

She set out to distinguish herself from realist fiction by the use of free indirect discourse, thereby avoiding the falsifying presence of an authorial narrator. In Mrs Dalloway she challenges the very concept of linear time and explores alternatives to traditional storytelling forms. For example, she portrays how the thoughts of people going about their separate business are temporarily bought together by each of them seeing a plane drawing an advert in the sky:

All down the Mall people were standing and looking up into the sky. As they looked the whole world became perfectly silent, and a flight of gulls crossed the sky, first one gull leading, then another, and in this extraordinary silence and peace, in this pallor, in this purity, bells struck eleven times, the sound fading up there among the gulls.

(Virginia Woolf, Mrs Dalloway)

A similar effect is created when a stately car bearing a government crest passes by. Her portrayal of a number of parallel, sometimes overlapping, events is quite cinematic in its effect. Mrs Dalloway is structured around the passing hours of the day, as marked by Big Ben. But the standardisation of time is arbitrary, suggests Woolf. Not just arbitrary, feminist critics have argued, but controlled by men. The masculine Big Ben strikes eleven-thirty and Peter Walsh, worried that he is late for an appointment, is relieved to hear the feminine bell of Saint Margaret’s strike the half hour slightly later:

I am not late. No, it is precisely half-past eleven, she says. Yet, though she is perfectly right, her voice, being the voice of the hostess, is reluctant to inflict its individuality.

(ibid.)

The Mall

A constant theme of modernist writing is that of generational difference; the conflict between of the Victorian generation and those of the twentieth-century, modern era. It is possible to perceive in Mrs Dallowaya generational difference between Clarissa Dalloway and her daughter, Elizabeth. The approach as to how each one travels the streets of London is very different. Clarissa, born in the Victorian era, walks up Bond Street with pleasure and impunity but does so only, she senses, by virtue of having become ‘invisible; unseen; unknown; there being no more marrying, no more having of children now’ In other words, she is middle-aged, no more of child-bearing age and most likely no longer sexually active.

Elizabeth, born after the turn of the century, rides up Whitehall on a bus, boarding it ‘most competently’ and feeling ‘delighted to be free.’ But if Clarissa’s public consciousness is determined by her sexuality, or by her sexuality as it is construed by others, so too is the daughter’s:

And already, even as she stood there [waiting for the omnibus], in her very well cut clothes, it was beginning…. People were beginning to compare her to poplar trees, early dawn, hyacinths, fawns, running water, and garden lilies; and it made her life a burden to her…. For it was beginning. Her mother could see that the compliments were beginning.

(ibid.)

Since its first use by Baudelaire in the nineteenth-century, the flâneur has proved to be a useful device for writers to employ in their explorations of the modern city. Walter Benjamin conducted a systematic review of the world that Baudelaire had created and set it within a framework of literary, sociological and historical theory. His flâneur was an idle stroller with an inquisitive mind and an aesthetic eye; a solitary figure, he avoided serious political and personal relationships, preferring to enjoy the aesthetics of city life; its material artefacts and human archetypes. The flâneur reads the city and finds beauty in liminal spaces and discarded objects.

The city, though, has traditionally been a male place, with women in a subservient role, or at best at the margins, and this gender bias was reflected in the writing of that period. Benjamin’s work too was notable for the absence of women’s experiences. The writings of Virginia Woolf, and in particular Mrs Dalloway, have done much to redress this imbalance.

 

Image of Virginia Woolf : Creative Commons

Image of The Mall, 1920s: Courtesy of English Heritage

Posted in Home | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

One Moonlit Night – Book of the Month – October 2012

 

Several years ago I had a friend, Henk, whom I would meet up with from time to time to ‘drink beer and talk bollocks’, as he put it. For a period of several months he would invariably turn the conversation round to a book he was reading called One Moonlit Night. It was a tale, according to Henk, of myth and madness and was set in a small Welsh slate-mining town around the time of the Great War. He spent a long time reading that book; he had the Penguin dual-language version with the English text on the right-hand page and the original Welsh on the left. Henk, despite his being at least partly of Welsh ancestry, wasn’t a Cymraeg speaker, but he loved the sound of the language and would read the Welsh text out loud just to enjoy the music of the unfamiliar words.

One Moonlit Night

Eventually he gave me his copy of the book and urged me to read it. I still have that copy and have read it several times, though only in English. So far.

Bethesda Slate Quarry  Bethesda

One Moonlit Night is a powerful evocation of loss, grief and madness set in a small community. A community that clings to a landscape that is scarred by the workings of the slate industry and a people many of whom are equally damaged. The book is Gothic in its tone and the atmosphere that Prichard evokes. Like that other great example of Gothic expressionism, Mervyn Peake’s Gormenghast trilogy, One Moonlit Night is peopled by a number of grotesque characters with strange names: Will Starch Collar, Bob Milk Cart, Owen the Coal and Humphrey Top House. But underlying all the various human dramas of his book, Prichard depicts something bigger, something much older. The very landscape upon which the village is precariously lodged is always there; it waits and watches.

To think there was a time I didn’t know where Post Lane went after it passed the end of Black Lake. Emyr, Little Owen the Coal’s Big Brother was the first person I remember walking as far as the end of Black Lake, but he didn’t carry on any further cos they found him there on his knees, with his shoes off and his feet all blistered, crying and shouting for his Mam. Huw and me couldn’t understand what was wrong with him, and Moi was only pretending to understand, that’s for sure, or else he would have told us.

The unnamed narrator is a boy who lives with his Mam in a tight-knit community. Their relationship is touchingly warm and loving, and is apparently based on Prichard’s memories of his own mother. The boy has two close friends, Huw and Moi. Together the boys come to learn about sex, death and madness. The tone is bleak, but not without humour. The narrator, despite the hardships he experiences, is uncomplaining and accepting. Indeed, the overall effect of the story of his childhood is life-affirming; Prichard shows us through his protagonist that he loves life because it is so precarious.

But one character, deep and brooding, remains in my memory longer than all of the others. Black Lake, just outside the village and as ancient as the hills in which it nestles seems to act as a repository of all the joys and sorrows, generation upon generation, that have been enacted upon the local landscape. And, at the conclusion of Prichard’s beguiling tale, the lake’s black waters act as a mirror to reflect the cruel light of the moon.

Jees, the old lake looks good too. It’s strange that they call it Black Lake cos I can see the sky in it. Blue Lake would be a better name for it, cos it looks as though it’s full of blue eyes. Blue eyes laughing at me. Blue eyes laughing at me. Blue eyes laughing

Caradog Prichard: A Brief Biography

Caradog Prichard was born in 1904 in the Welsh slate-quarrying town of Bethesda. He worked on a number of Welsh local newspapers before moving to London where he became a sub-editor on the Daily Telegraph’s foreign desk. His published works include three collections of poetry and a semi-fictional autobiography. One Moonlit Night is his only published novel and, though first published in Welsh, it has since been translated into English and seven other languages. Caradog Prichard died in 1980.

Posted in Home | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

October 2012

This past month Psychogeographic Review has been reading:

Maurice E.M Forster   ‘Maurice’ – E.M. Forster

The Best of Dorothy Parker’   ‘The Best of Dorothy Parker’ – erm, Dorothy Parker

Explorers of the New Century Magnus Miles   ‘Explorers of the New Century’ – Magnus Mills

The Awakening Kate Chopin   ‘The Awakening’ – Kate Chopin

Journey Through Britain John Hillaby   ‘Journey Through Britain’ – John Hillaby

Kingfishers Catch Fire Rumer Godden   ‘Kingfishers Catch Fire’ – Rumer Godden

The Goldilocks Enigma Paul Davies   ‘The Goldilocks Enigma’ – Paul Davies

Tooth & Nail Ian Rankin   ‘Tooth & Nail’ – Ian Rankin

 

Meanwhile, we were listening to:

Dry the River Shallow Bed   ‘Shallow Bed’ – Dry the River

Current 93 Black Ships Ate the Sky   ‘Black Ships Ate the Sky’ – Current 93

Joni Mitchell The Hissing of Summer Lawns   ‘The Hissing of Summer Lawns’ – Joni Mitchell

Traffic When the Eagle Flies   ‘When the Eagle Flies’ – Traffic

Miles Davis Bitches Brew   ‘Bitches Brew’ – Miles Davis

Johnny Cash Live at Folsom Prison   ‘Live at Folsom Prison’ – Johnny Cash

Posted in Home | Leave a comment

Walking Alone

 

Imagine you were a child with undiagnosed asthma and older brothers who always raced ahead when you were out walking. Supposing too that you were so completely urban in your upbringing that you always experienced a feeling of spatial illiteracy when asked to read a rural landscape…

This poem, on the other hand, is a meditation on a grown up recognition of the freedom of solitude. By Liz Lefroy.

.

Walking Alone

 

This wind: it blows wild,

makes my hair shadows dance

on the pelleted grass.

 

I walk between plant pads

which ask nothing, not a name,

nor even a remark on their likeness

 

or difference from that time

which was another season

or in another place.

 

My pace, my breath

and its increase are my own:

the summit offers herself

 

as a permanence which

does not have to be climbed.

Behind me, and high

 

a kestrel hangs, though

I do not turn round to look,

and no one cries, Too late, too late!

 

And some footage of one of Liz’s readings can be found here.

Posted in Home | Tagged , , | Leave a comment